Eleonora Rosati, IP Time 25 september
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zaWlS0boo4
LINKs al material mencionado por la Prof. Eleonora Rosati
(gentileza de Simona-Inés Nitescu)
LINKs al material mencionado por la Prof. Eleonora Rosati
(gentileza de Simona-Inés Nitescu)
The links to the judgments which Prof. Rosati presented today:
C-683/17 – Cofemel
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2019
Cofemel – Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual and industrial property — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Article 2(a) — Concept of 'work'– Protection of works by copyright — Conditions — Connection with the protection of designs — Directive 98/71/EC — Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Clothing designs
C-833/18 - Brompton Bicycle
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 11 June 2020
SI and Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech / Get2Get
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de l'entreprise de Liège
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual and industrial property — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Articles 2 to 5 — Scope — Utilitarian object — Concept of ‘work’ — Copyright protection of works — Conditions — Shape of a product which is necessary to obtain a technical result — Folding bicycle
C-237/19 - Gömböc
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 April 2020
Gömböc Kutató, Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft. v Szellemi Tulajdon Nemzeti Hivatala
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trademarks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Refusal or invalidation of registration — Three-dimensional mark — Article 3(1)(e)(ii) and (iii) — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result — Sign consisting of the shape which gives substantial value to the goods — Consideration of the perception of the relevant public
T-658/18 - Hästens Sängar v EUIPO (Représentation d'un motif à carreaux)
Judgment of the General Court of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 3 December 2019
Hästens Sängar AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office
EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing a chequered gingham pattern — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001
Hague Court of Appeal – Eames DSW chair qualifies as a copyright work:
EUIPO Cancellation Division invalidates the "Flower Thrower" EU trademark of Banksy on ground of bad faith:
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario